There aren't any users online.
Do You Know? by Jericoke
[July 31, 2014, 07:00:01 pm]
More Games by lkjohnson1950
[July 31, 2014, 04:48:33 pm]
Now Bernie Says No Standing Re-Starts by cosworth151
[July 31, 2014, 11:36:06 am]
German Courts :fool: :fool: by cosworth151
[July 31, 2014, 11:24:16 am]
13-Year-Old Kalle Takes His Mother For a Ride by cosworth151
[July 31, 2014, 11:18:34 am]
Chat about the latest Formula 1 news from around the World with GPWizard
July 31, 2014, 04:48:33 pm by lkjohnson1950
Views: 46 | Comments: 0
Here are some other ID games. My scores ranged from 46% (cars of the '40s) to 98% (Muscle cars).
July 31, 2014, 04:06:09 pm by lkjohnson1950
Views: 50 | Comments: 1
Here's a little game of IDs. I got 46 of 48. Good Luck!!
July 31, 2014, 11:36:06 am by cosworth151
Views: 53 | Comments: 0
Shocking news! Bernie Ecclestone is making sense! I'm having visions of Invasion of the Body Snatchers.
It seems that the recent Hungarian GP has changed Bernie's mind about the standing restart rule for next season.
"There will be no standing starts after safety cars. What we saw in Budapest was good enough."
A further example of his sudden sanity: "We don't need Flavio."
July 30, 2014, 03:51:08 pm by Wizzo
Views: 80 | Comments: 2
Does everyone from Finland drive like this?
July 30, 2014, 03:45:00 pm by Wizzo
Views: 70 | Comments: 2
Yeah, every man needs one of these.
July 30, 2014, 07:27:00 am by monty
Views: 122 | Comments: 4
Isn't it funny that he didn't complain that no safety car was put out in Germany for a more dangerous situation
July 29, 2014, 08:35:16 pm by F1fanaticBD
Views: 101 | Comments: 5
I would like to wish all the members of GPWizard as well as their family and friends a warm wish for Eid-ul-Fitr
July 29, 2014, 06:30:30 pm by scott
Views: 140 | Comments: 7
Not sure how that really works, but according to the attached article, in Germany, a prosecutor can stop a court action if the defendant wants to settle the case in a way that all parties are satisfied. So Bernie's lawyers called for the case to be halted because there is not enough evidence to prosecute him, but he is willing to pay $25m to some bank to settle the case? I'm very confused. There are actually laws against bribery, yet they have this rule in their courts?