I remember when the Mercedes team was coming together the word was too many roosters in the hen house and it couldn't possibly work.
I wouldn't necessarily look to Wolff, nor Lauda nor Brawn as the villain here. Mercedes really was trying something new, so it's a shame it didn't work out, and much more a shame that it cost the sport a man like Brawn. Ultimately it was part of the process of learning how to run a factory backed F1 team. Mercedes realizing that having the 'best' people doesn't make the best team, and Brawn realizing that when you answer to millions of shareholders, you don't get everything you want.
As for his comment that Todt would never use the 'Ferrari Veto': I don't believe that for a second. I do believe anything Ferrari would have vetoed was simply never put forth: it would have embarrassed the sport too much.