Not only can I tell such people off, but I'm accustomed to it working in a way that Kimi's approach isn't. If I tried telling off foolsplainers in the way Kimi does, they'd get offended, not learn the lesson and carry on messing up. (The colleagues I'm familiar with don't mess up after being told off a bit more politely, but of course every team's people has different preferences).
Obviously, politesse and charging around at 200 mph are not innately compatible (hence the bleep-box gets used early and often in most races), so it's a bit more understandable that Kimi is more blunt... ...but the fact he still has to tell people off for this over a decade after he first brought it to engineers' attention tells me his approach doesn't work. Not for Ferrari, and not for the other teams he's driven for since radio communication was introduced.
Ferrari and Kimi may be happy with one another, but I don't think they're getting the best from one another, and that's one reason why Sebastian tends to do better than Kimi (and why, generally, the 2010s have been difficult for him in F1). I don't approve of his potty-mouthed approach in the car, but he knows how to tell his team to do things in a way that makes them happen. Sebastian does have a dribble of Michael Schumacher's power, but "a dribble" is still considerably more than Kimi's apparent total lack of power in his situation. I get the impression that Kimi is there because they need a filler while waiting for Leclerc to finish developing or an opportunistic "borrowing" of a newly-released top-line driver, not on his own merit.