collapse

* Welcome

Welcome to GPWizard F1 Forum!

GPWizard is the friendliest F1 forum you'll find anywhere. You have a host of new like-minded friends waiting to welcome you.

So what are you waiting for? Becoming a member is easy and free! Take a couple seconds out of your day and register now. We guarantee, you wont be sorry you did.

Click Here to become a full Member for Free

* User Info

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Newsletter

GPWizard F1 Forum Newsletter Email address:
Weekly
Fortnightly
Monthly

* Grid Game Deadlines

Qualifying

Race

* Credits Donated Back

User Amount
Dare 14,620
Cosworth151 12,000
Scott 11,000
Ian 10,000
AndyB 5,000
F1fanaticBD 4,000
Total 44,625

* Shoutbox

Refresh History
  • Scott: Fraid I won't be around for the season final...we have groups at the hotel lunch and dinner and we are moving Monday am, so barely a minute to sit down...perhaps I can pop in for a minute or two at some point.
    November 24, 2017, 07:55:09 AM
  • Wizzo: Hi Greg, you're better off telling us about your concept in a written post on the forum for all to see. I'm sure you'll get a few opinions.
    November 07, 2017, 05:37:04 PM
  • Greg_82: Hello, anyone online to discuss?
    November 06, 2017, 05:51:35 PM
  • Greg_82: the best would be to go on skype to discuss the concept, would that be possible with some of you guys?
    November 06, 2017, 12:31:49 PM
  • Greg_82: I'm new and I would like to know if some of you would have some time to spend with me because I'm launching a new concept about F1 and I would like to have your idea
    November 06, 2017, 12:31:22 PM
  • Greg_82: Hello
    November 06, 2017, 12:30:40 PM
  • Scott: No hassle, I just thought with all the merry go round, it might be easier to simply use a couple generic slots.  But anyhow, that's great Dare.
    October 26, 2017, 06:27:38 PM
  • Dare: Hartley and Gasly have been added to GG
    October 24, 2017, 11:28:40 PM
  • Scott: Paul
    October 24, 2017, 02:36:11 PM
  • Scott: I would say we use Hartly as Jenson Button on the GG and Gasly as Paur Di Resta...any nay's?
    October 24, 2017, 02:36:03 PM
  • Scott: For example we would need to add Gasly and Hartley for Mexico
    October 24, 2017, 02:34:54 PM
  • Scott: We could add in 'Driver 1' and 'Driver 2' and then make announcements in Shoutbox to tell people which driver sub is which (in the off chance that there are two).
    October 22, 2017, 02:15:55 PM
  • Scott: Not that I think he would actually make top 8
    October 22, 2017, 02:07:30 PM
  • Scott: I wonder if we shouldn't have one or two generic driver slots for substitutions, like Hartley
    October 22, 2017, 02:07:02 PM
  • ChrisCurtis: Well that’s an interesting start!
    September 17, 2017, 01:05:06 PM
  • Wizzo: Sorry guys I won't be around for the race chat as I will be watching the race on catch up
    September 17, 2017, 10:58:19 AM
  • Scott: Only around for lap 1-2 and then have to run today, but I'll duck into chat for the first few minutes
    September 03, 2017, 12:43:44 PM
  • cosworth151: Does Alonso's 35 place grid penalty mean that he'll be starting from Parabolica?
    September 02, 2017, 10:09:21 PM
  • Jericoke: Wizzo, my strategy was that everyone else would forget so my 9 points would vault me into the mid pack.  Thanks for ruining that!
    September 02, 2017, 06:19:43 PM
  • Wizzo: Don't forget there is another race this weekend. Get your Grid Game predictions in!
    September 01, 2017, 11:24:03 AM

* Who's Online

  • Dot Guests: 87
  • Dot Hidden: 0
  • Dot Users: 2
  • Dot Users Online:

* Top Posters

cosworth151 cosworth151
14348 Posts
Scott Scott
13162 Posts
Dare Dare
11772 Posts
Ian Ian
9484 Posts
John S John S
9328 Posts

* IntentsGP Advert

pre-erected f1 camping & glamping with intentsGP

Author Topic: Ferrari: Better performance, worse reliability?  (Read 337 times)

Offline rmassart

Ferrari: Better performance, worse reliability?
« on: October 09, 2017, 11:09:01 AM »
  • Publish
  • I've not followed the upgrades Ferrari made to their engines over the season (and to be honest I don't have a clear view of how and when you can make changes), but I am wondering if Ferrari's reliability issues have come as a result of engine upgrades (not just replacements). It strikes me that in Italy Mercedes utterly dominated Ferrari, but all of a sudden in Malaysia and Japan Ferrari were able to put them under real pressure (as well as of course Singapore). They would probably have won the last two races if not for reliability issues.  These things are usually put down to bad luck, but maybe they've been pushing their engine development too fast in a bid to keep up with Mercedes?  I don't believe that three severe "power unit" issues in 2 races is purely bad luck...    (Vettel Malaysia Qualifying, Raikonnen Malaysia Race, Vettel Japan Race).




    Online cosworth151

    Re: Ferrari: Better performance, worse reliability?
    « Reply #1 on: October 09, 2017, 12:37:24 PM »
  • Publish
  • You might be on to something. Ferrari does seem to have a hand grenade, powerful but very short lived.

    One other thing all three incidents have in common - the team seemed to not know what to do about the problems. They worked long & hard to sort out the issues without good result.
    “You can search the world over for the finer things, but you won't find a match for the American road and the creatures that live on it.”
    ― Bob Dylan

    Offline Robem64

    Re: Ferrari: Better performance, worse reliability?
    « Reply #2 on: October 09, 2017, 12:41:46 PM »
  • Publish
  • I was rather astounded though that a broken spark plug was the reason for the Japan retirement...sounds pretty basic to me that one!
    "I'm not a pessimist, I'm an optimist with experience"

    Offline Jericoke

    Re: Ferrari: Better performance, worse reliability?
    « Reply #3 on: October 09, 2017, 01:57:02 PM »
  • Publish
  • I would imagine that engineers come up with a conservative 'guaranteed' design, and a fast but 'risky' design.

    You've got to start the season with the guaranteed design, but at some point a risk must be taken.  Mercedes stayed with their conservative design, Ferrari expected them to take a risk and had to take a risk to keep ahead.

    It's easy to see it was a poor choice now, but the race is run at HQ as much as it is in the first corner

    Offline lkjohnson1950

    Re: Ferrari: Better performance, worse reliability?
    « Reply #4 on: October 09, 2017, 07:07:58 PM »
  • Publish
  • According to what I've read (Autoweek, Racer??) the Malaysia failures were both cracked intake manifolds, a part Ferrari has been using all season. It took them totally by surprise and they have somehow strengthened the part going forward.
    Lonny

    Quidco - Get Paid For Shopping