GPWizard F1 Forum
Fun Stuff => F1 Grid Game => Topic started by: Scott on July 10, 2017, 08:24:17 AM
-
With all the grid penalties, the pole pick isn't so clear. We have gone with whoever starts on pole is the pole pick, but perhaps we should re-visit that choice and ask what your preference is. Please give some justification in a post after you choose.
-
I think it should be the fastest driver in Q3. Engine and component penalties are not achievements.
-
Because I think grid penalties like Lewis' are stupid. Since I don't play GG tou are welcome to throw my vote out.
-
I'm going with the fastest in Q3. We've seen times when an engine or gearbox change after quali has bumped a pole sitter back. There is no way to predict occurrences like that.
-
I'd like it to be the fastest time in Q3 as well.
It's a shootout, it's often the most exciting part of an F1 weekend. I'd like to watch it and know if I got (or lost) my GG point instead of finding out the next day.
Now, if someone is disqualified from Q3 after the fact, then it's okay to switch to the driver with the fastest official time.
-
I'm sorry but I think it should be the car that starts on pole. It seems to me that more drivers have been removed from pole at a race start because of driving standards penalties than for a drop from new equipment use, I could be wrong but it feels that way.
Not sure the GG rules can be amended to enable a simple distinction for a penalty only being related to mechanical or electrical issues. The great strength of Wiz's GG is the minimal & easy to follow rules.
I for one would be very annoyed if a driver could still retain the pole in our game when found guilty of dodgy driving standards.
-
I'm sorry but I think it should be the car that starts on pole. It seems to me that more drivers have been removed from pole at a race start because of driving standards penalties than for a drop from new equipment use, I could be wrong but it feels that way.
Not sure the GG rules can be amended to enable a simple distinction for a penalty only being related to mechanical or electrical issues. The great strength of Wiz's GG is the minimal & easy to follow rules.
I for one would be very annoyed if a driver could still retain the pole in our game when found guilty of dodgy driving standards.
To be clear, I'm not going to quit playing the GG if the rules aren't updated. I don't think one side is 100% 'right' or 'wrong'. I just like being able to win (or lose) something on Saturday.
I'm totally okay with the FIA shuffling the deck so cheaters never prosper. We're just 'betting' on who sets the fastest lap, not who 'deserves' to sit on pole.
-
To be clear, I'm not going to quit playing the GG if the rules aren't updated. I don't think one side is 100% 'right' or 'wrong'. I just like being able to win (or lose) something on Saturday.
I'm totally okay with the FIA shuffling the deck so cheaters never prosper. We're just 'betting' on who sets the fastest lap, not who 'deserves' to sit on pole.
Hey maybe that's the answer Jeri, we need to choose who sets 'fastest lap in Q3' not pole. ;)
Somehow though it doesn't seem right though, :stop: Pole is such an iconic motor racing term isn't it.
Can you imagine Tennis without Love. :crazy:
-
I'm sure most of you are aware that I run an F1 game for family and friends and we have "Pole - The driver who is fastest in Q3" this was because with busy lives and being like the GG played all over the world a driver being given a grid penalty after P3 disadvantaged anyone who was not watching every minute of the build up or maybe was was asleep at 0100 in the morning.
The argument that a driver who gets pole illegally due to driving standards or something the driver has done, M Schumacher in Monaco, and is then removed from pole because of that effectively never won pole in the first place. Cheats never prosper or so we like to think and the distinction between a driver penalty and constructor penalty are quite clear.
I'm not subscribing to the GG changing and I have a preference like everyone else but I signed up to play under the rules that the GG organisers set.
-
I think it would be best to keep it the way it is for
the rest the season. Maybe next we can have a vote on it.
-
I think it would be best to keep it the way it is for
the rest the season. Maybe next we can have a vote on it.
I quite agree Dare mid-season is not the time.
-
Andy how many years have toy had your game? How'd you
get the idea? Have you ever won and have you had any repeat winners?
How do you keep score? In the early years I did it by paper and pencil.
The past 5 years we"ve had a scoring system developed by Wiz that
does it all for you. As long as you enter the results right.
-
We're not 'betting' on the driver who has received a penalty from the previous race, be it mechanical or driver infraction. Like Andy said for his game, not everybody is available or interested enough to pay attention to who broke a gearbox in FP3. As for driver infractions, the only effect it has is who to automatically NOT pick. If you didn't happen to hear them mention who gets a grid penalty because the broadcast is in another language or you didn't spend enough time scouting F1 articles then you will find 'your guy' is starting 10 places back for cutting off a Ferrari during the last race or a FP.
It's just a game people. There is no implied contract if you play or not, and I think we have massaged rule details in the past mid-season, so to wait much longer with the chaotic grid penalties almost every race, is pointless. And really...we are talking about one point. Nobody is suggesting making it retroactive, so really a simple fix.
But I think we can all have the discussion at least. No rush, we can look at it again after a couple of races...I don't think most of us really count on getting much out of the GG other than a bit of fun, friendly competition and bragging rights.
-
Andy how many years have toy had your game? How'd you
get the idea? Have you ever won and have you had any repeat winners?
How do you keep score? In the early years I did it by paper and pencil.
The past 5 years we"ve had a scoring system developed by Wiz that
does it all for you. As long as you enter the results right.
Port Nelson F1 Game started four years ago Dare while I was working and others there followed F1 to different degrees and none of them were interested in playing the GG so I put a spreadsheet together limiting players to ten although I have eleven this year. Each players has a team so becomes a team manager they select three drivers one from the top 5 teams of the previous season and two drivers from the rest, no drivers can be in the same team. A chassis such as Mercedes and an engine such as Ferrari but the engine you choose cannot be in the chassis you choose so when selecting your engine you have to designate the chassis its in so a Mercedes Chassis and Mercedes engine in a Williams is ok. Where your drivers finish and where both cars for you chassis and engine finish are your points. Then there's predictions for Pole, Rain, DNF's, Fastest lap, Safety car with 10 points for each one correct and a one off Double up. Rain is decided by one car completes a race lap on wets to intermediates. I calculate the result manually hence the limit on numbers.
I've won it a couple of times as has another guy I have also come last!
We used to have prizes but now its just for fun.
I could always email you a spreadsheet if your interested.
-
Scott's right, it's a GAME ( although I suspect there are prize hunters in it) and although the prizes Wiz has are great it's the 5 chequered flags by your name that's great.
-
And really...we are talking about one point. Nobody is suggesting making it retroactive, so really a simple fix.
Actually it's two points Scott, but whose counting. ;) :tease:
By the by, no one actually picked the real pole sitter in the race last Sunday - who also happened to be the fastest in Q3 as well as the driver starting on pole - so isn't all this rule re-writing a tad premature? :confused:
-
Pole points should be awarded for whoever starts on pole not who is fastest ion Q3. The grid game rules make sense because consider what happens if the fastest driver in Q3 is disqualified for some reason, such as the Michael Schumacher parking stunt at Monaco in 2006. Such a breach of the rules should result in that prediction not being valid for pole. It's the same for all these gearbox and engine penalties. The penalties are the problem, not the grid game rules.
-
The penalties are the problem, not the grid game rules.
I suppose I thought our game could adapt quite a bit quicker than the FIA, and add a dose of common sense for other if's, and's or but's.