F1's power struggle

[Scott]

The Ferrari argument makes sense on every point.  Most important is where Marchionne suggests it is the job of FOM to ensure smaller teams viability, not Ferrari's.   

http://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/35103892

So Todt has obviously seen the benefit of teaming up with Bernie, but those two are up against some new players at Ferrari and Mercedes, not to mention very p*ssed off bosses at RBR and Mclaren, and a midfield having hissy fits about the lack of cash flowing down their way.  Could we really be near the breaking point opening up the possibility of a new team owned and run series?  I hope so.  Tell Jean & Bernie to go stuff themselves.  Even if it meant that F1 would be a mess as it sorted itself out for a couple of years, I would stay with it.

[Jericoke]

If F1 splinters, overall I don't think it would be good for the sport.  It won't be fair to the factory workers, people who make their livelihood trackside, or even fans who will have trouble planning their family time around watching schedules.

The threat of a split might be good though.  It's a big pie, and it makes more sense to share it instead of creating two smaller ones.  Sometimes seeing the alternative is the best way to see that the best option is right in front of you.

However, personally I find the behind the scenes machinations fascinating, and I'd love to watch the drama unfold.  Having twice as many F1 races has the possibility of being great.  (or two watered down series has the possibility of being twice as disappointing, of course)