collapse

* User Info

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Newsletter

GPWizard F1 Forum Newsletter Email address:
Weekly
Fortnightly
Monthly

* Grid Game Deadlines

Qualifying

Race

* Shoutbox

Refresh History
  • Wizzo: :good:
    March 05, 2024, 11:44:46 PM
  • Dare: my chat button is onthe bottom rightWiz
    March 03, 2024, 11:58:24 PM
  • Wizzo: Yes you should see the chat room button at the bottom left of your screen
    March 02, 2024, 11:39:55 PM
  • Open Wheel: Is there a Chat room button or something to access “Race day conversation”
    March 02, 2024, 02:46:02 PM
  • Wizzo: The 2024 Grid Game is here!  :yahoo:
    January 30, 2024, 01:42:23 PM
  • Wizzo: Hey everybody - the shout box is back!  :D
    August 21, 2023, 12:18:19 PM

* Who's Online

  • Dot Guests: 267
  • Dot Hidden: 0
  • Dot Users: 0

There aren't any users online.

* Top Posters

cosworth151 cosworth151
16412 Posts
Scott Scott
14057 Posts
Dare Dare
13313 Posts
John S John S
11761 Posts
Ian Ian
9732 Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1


Which actually brings up an interesting tangent.  F1 teams are worth more than ever because... F1 teams are worth more than ever (I understand economics less than I understand hybrid power units).  If Aston Martin can spend a bazillion dollars and then face plant, maybe investors will wonder what they're paying for with other teams, like Alpine or Williams if they're not getting wins.  Even McLaren, Audi and Ferrari answer to people who invest ungodly amounts of money for no tangible reason.

What you're missing out in your economic equation, Jeri, is many teams now make profits at the end of the year. Record payouts from Concorde and big money from sponsors set next to cost cap means most of grid can be in profit. Some like Merc, Ferrari and Red Bull very big profits, bigger teams get more Concorde payouts & much bigger sponsor money. That's the goal Papa Stroll is aiming for Aston race team.

Investors don't complain about companies who are 3rd, 4th, or even 10th in the market place if they are making profit & share value rises, or at least stays up.

Capital gains of teams are valuable too, ask the investors who bought 25% of Alpine from Renault and are now valuing that stake at 2 or 3 times the original cost - according to news about Horner's attempt to purchase same.

Add in the anti dilution fee now being at least $450m, for any new 12th entrant, even worst team on grid has a starting point well north of that for resale rather than zero. 

2
I'm sure this is going to help......not.
Heard some folks saying in a 55 lap race there will be a parade for 50 laps then a 5 lap sprint.
Poor poor poor Aston Martin.....mark my words.

After watching the long distance short track speed skating at the winter Olympics, that's a common strategy :)

Aston Martin is many things, but poor is not one of them.

Yet.

Which actually brings up an interesting tangent.  F1 teams are worth more than ever because... F1 teams are worth more than ever (I understand economics less than I understand hybrid power units).  If Aston Martin can spend a bazillion dollars and then face plant, maybe investors will wonder what they're paying for with other teams, like Alpine or Williams if they're not getting wins.  Even McLaren, Audi and Ferrari answer to people who invest ungodly amounts of money for no tangible reason.
3
I'm sure this is going to help......not.
Heard some folks saying in a 55 lap race there will be a parade for 50 laps then a 5 lap sprint.
Poor poor poor Aston Martin.....mark my words.
4
Pit Pass / Oz potential issues.
« Last post by Philbe on March 03, 2026, 05:30:11 PM »
This little dust up in the middle east is causing logistic delays in getting gear and team members to the show. Kym Illman had a good video on YT about it. Since no flights are passing through Dubai or Qatar teams are having to go the long way from the UK to get to Melbourne. Does look like the show will go on though.
5
F1 Teams / Re: McLaren F1 2024 champions but only 4th in cash payout from liberty
« Last post by Jericoke on February 28, 2026, 02:31:32 PM »
I get that the Concord agreement is complicated, and also that keeping Ferrari from breaking away.

I do feel that it's slightly unfair that McLaren has the testing/wind tunnel limitations of winning, but don't get the money for winning!
6
F1 Teams / McLaren F1 2024 champions but only 4th in cash payout from liberty
« Last post by John S on February 28, 2026, 12:13:07 PM »
Concorde special deals trumps winning top F1 honours. Even the lowest still make big sums though.

https://www.planetf1.com/news/f1-2025-prize-money-payouts-revealed-mclaren-crowned-champions-as-ferrari-steal-the-spoils
7
One detection point then overtake boost lasts a whole lap not just specific zones.

As Pitpass.com says, any questions send a postcard to FIA or Liberty.  :DD

https://www.pitpass.com/82108/5-Straight-Zones-for-Melbourne
8
Seems like Toto was up to usual F1 sandbagging when protesting heavily about change of Regs on engine compression, he's now voted in favour of new earlier hot testing.  :swoon:

He'll say it was about the principal of fairness to stick to the printed rulebook, and that's a good point, however he was probably not as fussed as other PU makers were over subject, it appears he simply used the controversy to wind up rivals.  ;)

According to Motorsport-Magazin, the proposal to introduce a new fuel compression ratio check in August is off aggenda.
It will now arrive in June instead, suprisingly all 5 engine makers voted in favour - even Merc.  |-(

Mercedes’ rivals changed their minds about the August timeline after Toto Wolff’s surprisingly positive reaction. Two months earlier than planned, the engines will be tested at 130 degrees, in addition to the pre-existing room temperature checks.

From 2027, the power units will only be measured when hot. Contrary to the prevailing understanding, the compression ratio actually drops on track, so it should be easier to comply with the 16:1 limit in theory.

Now for the rub: Motorsport-Magazin also reports Merc have apparently found a way to reach 16.3:1 at temperature, much lower than the 18:1 that’s been widely touted but still a meaningful advantage, with competitors only at 15.2:1 when hot.  :D
9
When I first started watching F1, the rule book was little more than a pamphlet. A few minimums and maximums and go for it. We got 1500cc 4s, 6s, 8s, and 12s. Colin Chapman had 2 mechanics and drove the transporter himself. I realize it had to change over the years, and it was mostly for the better. A few things were always the same. Keep the rules to a minimum, and go as fast as physics would allow within the rules. I feel that's no longer true. Recent rules changes have restricted the creativity and attempted to "Go Green".  :sick: Lifting and coasting, or sacrificing top speed in favor of harvesting during qually is not what I signed up for. WEC has done a much better job of integrating hybrid systems without handicapping the cars. Give them a battery and an ERS that charges it during normal racing. I haven't signed up for Apple yet and I continue to waffle.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10

SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal
Menu Editor Pro 1.0 | Copyright 2013, Matthew Kerle