GPWizard F1 Forum

F1 News & Discussions => General F1 Discussion => Topic started by: Andy B on October 15, 2021, 09:53:18 PM

Title: 23 for 22?
Post by: Andy B on October 15, 2021, 09:53:18 PM
So just announced the 2022 calendar of 23 races but is that too many?
I'll feel for the race team as they will be spending a lot of time away from home and there has to be a work life balance in every occupation.
Is it a case of more races equals more money?
Provisional 2022 Formula 1 calendar

Date   Grand Prix   Venue
20 March   Bahrain   Sakhir
27 March   Saudi Arabia   Jeddah
10 April   Australia   Melbourne
24 April   Emilia Romagna   Imola*
8 May   Miami   Miami**
22 May   Spain   Barcelona*
29 May   Monaco   Monaco
12 June   Azerbaijan   Baku
19 June   Canada   Montreal
3 July   United Kingdom   Silverstone
10 July   Austria   Spielberg
24 July   France   Le Castellet
31 July   Hungary   Budapest
28 August   Belgium   Spa
4 September   Netherlands   Zandvoort
11 September   Italy   Monza
25 September   Russia   Sochi
2 October   Singapore   Singapore*
9 October   Japan   Suzuka
23 October   USA   Austin*
30 October   Mexico   Mexico City
13 November   Brazil   Sao Paulo
20 November   Abu Dhabi   Abu Dhabi
Title: Re: 23 for 22?
Post by: cosworth151 on October 16, 2021, 11:58:18 AM
I just wish that F1 paid more attention to the quality of the tracks rather than the quantity.
Title: Re: 23 for 22?
Post by: Scott on October 16, 2021, 05:38:49 PM
I’m ok with it.  A billion dollar sport can run 60-70 competition days a year.

They have to sort out the confusing regulations and specs for the cars though, and yes, improve the tracks with the main focus being competitive and safe races.
Title: Re: 23 for 22?
Post by: lkjohnson1950 on October 16, 2021, 06:52:01 PM
They're probably thinking some of those will drop out. With 23 they can lose 3 and still have the 20 they need for the contracts.
Title: Re: 23 for 22?
Post by: John S on October 18, 2021, 02:10:00 PM
Maybe it's too many for some, but being retired and carefree - well almost  :D - I look forward to the extra race/s.

I found these interesting paragraphs in a Deiter Rencken, Racefans.net article of 16th Oct, quoting from “If You Come Second You Have Lost” a book by Cedric Selzer, in which he explains the enormous in season workload for F1 track mechanics in the early 1960s. The seasons then were from early Jan right thru to Mid or late Dec.  :swoon:

“We drove in shifts – as far as Enna (in Sicily) – then put in all-nighters, as many as were needed,” he recalls, adding that European rounds were drive-to races with customs points at every border and a raft of currencies per journey – no Easyjet, truck stops or credit cards back then. How many F1 races did he do that season?

“There were 24, 10 of which were world championship events and the rest non-championship races, but no less demanding for it, then tended the cars once at the circuit".

A total of 32 such races were scheduled that year (including two on the same day, as not all teams necessarily contested all of them). Granted, the proportion of events outside Europe was not as high as it is now. But nor did staff 50 years ago enjoy the benefit of a mandatory curfew on their race weekend working hours imposed by the rules as today’s crews do.

When air travel was needed it was by turboprops without the conveniences or speed of current aircraft. South Africa featured on the calendar and was a long haul, plus teams travelled to the USA and Mexico. Between those two races they headed for Detroit to fit a Ford engine to a ‘mule’ Lotus Indianapolis racer. No time off then?
“Of course not, we were there to work,” Selzer laughs.

Under the circumstances it is little wonder that Selzer recalls being away from home for well over a month on occasion, with three flyaway races falling within that period. He, though, considers himself fortunate to have escaped Tasmanian duties – his colleagues drew the wrong straws and were sent Down under for a series of events that later became known as the Tasman Cup. They were away for six weeks…



Check out the gruelling 1963 F1 race schedule at the end of the article.

https://www.racefans.net/2021/10/16/f1s-23-race-calendar-is-a-record-but-teams-have-worked-longer-seasons-before/
Title: Re: 23 for 22?
Post by: cosworth151 on October 18, 2021, 02:55:16 PM
Try this. NASCAR Grand National the same year. All 55 races were championship races. They ran 55 race seasons for several years in the early-mid 1960's.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1963_NASCAR_Grand_National_Series
Title: Re: 23 for 22?
Post by: Jericoke on October 18, 2021, 06:34:52 PM
I did watch a video with Christian Horner (not going to look it up, sorry), talking about how in the Schumacher days, teams would spend at least twice as much time testing as racing, so even a 23 race schedule isn't as much work as everyone says it is, compared with earlier eras.
Title: Re: 23 for 22?
Post by: Andy B on October 18, 2021, 09:41:41 PM
I did watch a video with Christian Horner (not going to look it up, sorry), talking about how in the Schumacher days, teams would spend at least twice as much time testing as racing, so even a 23 race schedule isn't as much work as everyone says it is, compared with earlier eras.

The difference being Jeri that there were test teams and race teams back then, I think the drivers will be fine it's the crews that'll suffer.
Title: Re: 23 for 22?
Post by: John S on October 19, 2021, 03:53:42 PM
I did watch a video with Christian Horner (not going to look it up, sorry), talking about how in the Schumacher days, teams would spend at least twice as much time testing as racing, so even a 23 race schedule isn't as much work as everyone says it is, compared with earlier eras.

The difference being Jeri that there were test teams and race teams back then, I think the drivers will be fine it's the crews that'll suffer.

Not sure a lot of F1 mechanics & track crew will be bothered about the extra race/s Andy. Most of em do it because they love it.

I remember when I was in my twenties & early thirties I worked plenty of extra and unsocial hours to get Free newspapers out, the group of us looked on it as us Agin the system.  ;)

Most weeks I put in over 70/80 hours, some of that was midnight or early morning dashes 100 miles or more to print works. We never found too much trouble getting others to share our lunacy, I suspect F1 is no different.
Title: Re: 23 for 22?
Post by: Alianora La Canta on October 22, 2021, 03:22:25 PM
Too many races. I now know 4 people who have said they're going part-time with their F1 support because of this (2 of them decided to apply it to 2021 as well "to get used to it"), and I'm considering reducing the amount of time I spend on F1 as well next year.

25% of staff told Dieter Rencker that they are quitting the travel team at the end of this year due to the proposed schedule, combined with the FIA banning more than 10 staff swaps during the season (out of a travel team of 48), with the notion that these are to cover illness and maybe needing to deputise one or two senior staff with obligations to their wider businesses. It doesn't matter how much you love something if it's been made impossible to do it (remember these people often have families - which unlike NASCAR and similar American series, cannot accompany the crews to all races in a motorhome - and all have to look after their health well enough to be able to work the whole season).

Furthermore, the paddock's looked consistently drained since Monza and it seems to be taking a toll on the quality of races. What is the point of doing it if you're not allowed to do your best work and other series (as well as the F1 team factories) do?

If a competition series can run 70 competition days a season... ...F1 competes 3 days a weekend (remember Spa - even non-Sprint weekends can have FP2 on Friday matter, and it's even less predictable). 70 / 3 = 23.333 . So on the upper calculation, F1 is right on the limit of what can be done.

Technically, only 15 are needed for the TV contracts, but Liberty's not allowed to leave money on the table because its shareholders are entitled to complain if so. Miami's track hasn't been officially approved by the FIA yet because it has to do that within 120 days of the race in the case of street tracks for first-time events (so it can't happen before January). That will almost certainly be approved.
Title: Re: 23 for 22?
Post by: Jericoke on October 22, 2021, 04:12:27 PM
I think you might have stumbled onto some valid reasons to have an extended season.

With a shorter season, each race 'counts', and if you can't watch them all, why watch any?  With a longer season, you can afford to be a casual fan, and let yourself not watch a race.  (Personally, I've probably missed maybe 10 races since I started watching f1... out of about 400 since 1996).  X fans watching 20 races isn't as many fans as 3X watching 12 out of 23 races.  (And following on instragram, youtube etc.)

I'm a hockey fan, and I probably watch half my team's games, and I don't feel bad about it.

Second, if teams are reaching 'burn out', that provides opportunity.  Historically the minnow teams would focus on having their car best for the track that suited their car, all their eggs in one (hopefully), glorious weekend.  Teams can focus on having their crew ready for a race they expect the 'big teams' to be burned out, providing a planned opportunity to take advantage of mistakes.

Agree or disagree, it's certainly an approach that a business could take.

Too many races. I now know 4 people who have said they're going part-time with their F1 support because of this (2 of them decided to apply it to 2021 as well "to get used to it"), and I'm considering reducing the amount of time I spend on F1 as well next year.

25% of staff told Dieter Rencker that they are quitting the travel team at the end of this year due to the proposed schedule, combined with the FIA banning more than 10 staff swaps during the season (out of a travel team of 48), with the notion that these are to cover illness and maybe needing to deputise one or two senior staff with obligations to their wider businesses. It doesn't matter how much you love something if it's been made impossible to do it (remember these people often have families - which unlike NASCAR and similar American series, cannot accompany the crews to all races in a motorhome - and all have to look after their health well enough to be able to work the whole season).

Furthermore, the paddock's looked consistently drained since Monza and it seems to be taking a toll on the quality of races. What is the point of doing it if you're not allowed to do your best work and other series (as well as the F1 team factories) do?

If a competition series can run 70 competition days a season... ...F1 competes 3 days a weekend (remember Spa - even non-Sprint weekends can have FP2 on Friday matter, and it's even less predictable). 70 / 3 = 23.333 . So on the upper calculation, F1 is right on the limit of what can be done.

Technically, only 15 are needed for the TV contracts, but Liberty's not allowed to leave money on the table because its shareholders are entitled to complain if so. Miami's track hasn't been officially approved by the FIA yet because it has to do that within 120 days of the race in the case of street tracks for first-time events (so it can't happen before January). That will almost certainly be approved.
Title: Re: 23 for 22?
Post by: Andy B on October 22, 2021, 09:23:13 PM
Well put Ali I have reduced the amount I watch already and I thought being retired I would watch more not less.
I always used to watch Friday, Saturday and Sunday in full but I tend to read more and am considering cancelling my F1 feed subscription which will then mean I'll not watch any at all.

I have to disagree with John S as like Ali I think the crews will burn out with all the travelling and hotels but time will tell.

Too many races. I now know 4 people who have said they're going part-time with their F1 support because of this (2 of them decided to apply it to 2021 as well "to get used to it"), and I'm considering reducing the amount of time I spend on F1 as well next year.

25% of staff told Dieter Rencker that they are quitting the travel team at the end of this year due to the proposed schedule, combined with the FIA banning more than 10 staff swaps during the season (out of a travel team of 48), with the notion that these are to cover illness and maybe needing to deputise one or two senior staff with obligations to their wider businesses. It doesn't matter how much you love something if it's been made impossible to do it (remember these people often have families - which unlike NASCAR and similar American series, cannot accompany the crews to all races in a motorhome - and all have to look after their health well enough to be able to work the whole season).

Furthermore, the paddock's looked consistently drained since Monza and it seems to be taking a toll on the quality of races. What is the point of doing it if you're not allowed to do your best work and other series (as well as the F1 team factories) do?

If a competition series can run 70 competition days a season... ...F1 competes 3 days a weekend (remember Spa - even non-Sprint weekends can have FP2 on Friday matter, and it's even less predictable). 70 / 3 = 23.333 . So on the upper calculation, F1 is right on the limit of what can be done.

Technically, only 15 are needed for the TV contracts, but Liberty's not allowed to leave money on the table because its shareholders are entitled to complain if so. Miami's track hasn't been officially approved by the FIA yet because it has to do that within 120 days of the race in the case of street tracks for first-time events (so it can't happen before January). That will almost certainly be approved.
Title: Re: 23 for 22?
Post by: John S on October 23, 2021, 11:11:02 AM

I always used to watch Friday, Saturday and Sunday in full but I tend to read more and am considering cancelling my F1 feed subscription which will then mean I'll not watch any at all.


 :o :o :o  OMG Andy! - You mustn't lose the faith.   :nono:  :stop:

I must admit I could do without some races like boring bloody Spanish GP or the French monstrosity that is Paul Ricard, but then we get races at Baku, Monza, & Turkey this year that more than make up for it.

I've certainly missed races over the years, mostly for family events & such, and still occasionally do, it's refreshing though to find I love it as much at the next one. 

They promise the racing will be closer, and so more exciting next year, at least stay with F1 until mid season next year to see before you walk away. 

Anyway the rest of us here would miss you around the place,  :(
- we'd have less posts from the other side of the world to wake up to, too.  ;)
Title: Re: 23 for 22?
Post by: lkjohnson1950 on October 23, 2021, 10:22:06 PM

I always used to watch Friday, Saturday and Sunday in full but I tend to read more and am considering cancelling my F1 feed subscription which will then mean I'll not watch any at all.


 :o :o :o  OMG Andy! - You mustn't lose the faith.   :nono:  :stop:

I must admit I could do without some races like boring bloody Spanish GP or the French monstrosity that is Paul Ricard, but then we get races at Baku, Monza, & Turkey this year that more than make up for it.

I've certainly missed races over the years, mostly for family events & such, and still occasionally do, it's refreshing though to find I love it as much at the next one. 

They promise the racing will be closer, and so more exciting next year, at least stay with F1 until mid season next year to see before you walk away. 

Anyway the rest of us here would miss you around the place,  :(
- we'd have less posts from the other side of the world to wake up to, too.  ;)

Indeed! :good: :good: :good:
Title: Re: 23 for 22?
Post by: Andy B on October 24, 2021, 07:54:33 AM

I always used to watch Friday, Saturday and Sunday in full but I tend to read more and am considering cancelling my F1 feed subscription which will then mean I'll not watch any at all.


 :o :o :o  OMG Andy! - You mustn't lose the faith.   :nono:  :stop:

I must admit I could do without some races like boring bloody Spanish GP or the French monstrosity that is Paul Ricard, but then we get races at Baku, Monza, & Turkey this year that more than make up for it.

I've certainly missed races over the years, mostly for family events & such, and still occasionally do, it's refreshing though to find I love it as much at the next one. 

They promise the racing will be closer, and so more exciting next year, at least stay with F1 until mid season next year to see before you walk away. 

Anyway the rest of us here would miss you around the place,  :(
- we'd have less posts from the other side of the world to wake up to, too.  ;)

Indeed! :good: :good: :good:

That's very kind of you to say so.  :good:
Title: Re: 23 for 22?
Post by: Willy on October 25, 2021, 09:18:02 PM
It matters not to me.
I don't get to watch live anyway so as long as F1 TV has them on, I can watch when I want.
Title: Re: 23 for 22?
Post by: Monty on October 26, 2021, 10:27:55 AM
It is a bit odd to extend the calendar while putting further cost restrictions in place but I'm sure (if all the races actually take place) the teams will cope.
Title: Re: 23 for 22?
Post by: Alianora La Canta on October 26, 2021, 12:16:12 PM
The teams don't seem to be coping with the current calendar (visibly exhausted to the point of dropping performance 8 races before the end, with even a 2-week break not improving things), I don't see how they're magically going to cope better with more rounds.
Title: Re: 23 for 22?
Post by: Jericoke on October 26, 2021, 06:49:28 PM
The teams don't seem to be coping with the current calendar (visibly exhausted to the point of dropping performance 8 races before the end, with even a 2-week break not improving things), I don't see how they're magically going to cope better with more rounds.

It won't be magical, it will be management.  F1  is very much a technical sport, but it's also a logistical one.  The teams who excel at the technical aspects tend to do better, but over a long season, whoever works out the logistics will find they have an edge. 

Part of Mercedes' successes over Ferrari was that the team kept more disciplined over the season than Ferrari did.  Red Bull seems to be pulling the same trick on Mercedes now.

There's always talk about F1 technology 'trickling down' to real world cars. F1 pit stops have been used as a template for complex procedures being coordinated.  Running an F1 team can also lead to new ways of running a high performance organization.  Maybe they don't need as many people at the track.  Maybe certain tasks can be rotated better so different people are traveling from weekend to weekend.

Or maybe it's not a solvable problem at all, and the teams will have to fight for a bigger cap to have enough people.  (More races should mean more money for the teams.  They've gotten together on issues before, they can do it again)
Title: Re: 23 for 22?
Post by: Alianora La Canta on October 27, 2021, 11:55:08 AM
My point is they haven't got the management to handle the current calendar. If one has too much of something, one cannot expect success by adding more of it. (Especially since, as far as I can tell, this is hitting everyone equally, and impairing the quality of competition equally. That's why I haven't put in a Heroes or Zeroes this time - it was such an unmemorable race for me that the only thing that jumped out was that everyone was too exhausted to do their best work, including the winner).

Note that teams are barred from rotating more than 10 staff in a year, and if exhaustion's an issue, more staff rather than less would be the staff-numbers-based way to alleviate it. It would require 60 more staff per team (plus 100% extra on the travelling staff of all other entities that are meant to do the whole calendar rather than one/a few rounds) and permission to do a full rotation every year (including drivers and team leaders) to work, along with the increase in permitted funding to pay for all that.
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal
Menu Editor Pro 1.0 | Copyright 2013, Matthew Kerle