collapse

* Welcome

Welcome to GPWizard F1 Forum!

GPWizard is the friendliest F1 forum you'll find anywhere. You have a host of new like-minded friends waiting to welcome you.

So what are you waiting for? Becoming a member is easy and free! Take a couple seconds out of your day and register now. We guarantee, you wont be sorry you did.

Click Here to become a full Member for Free

* User Info

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Newsletter

GPWizard F1 Forum Newsletter Email address:
Weekly
Fortnightly
Monthly

* Grid Game Deadlines

Qualifying

Race

* Shoutbox

Refresh History
  • Wizzo: Chat room now available. See you in there
    July 05, 2020, 02:05:12 PM
  • cosworth151: Hey Wizzo. I can see that you & dd are in the chat room but I can't get in!
    July 05, 2020, 02:04:26 PM
  • Wizzo: Hi Andy, ill look at this tomorrow.  Thanks
    May 19, 2020, 10:08:09 PM
  • Andy B: Hi Wiz, I have tried to make a donation using my UK bank account but PayPal will not accept the card as I live in NZ and have a UK card? This is not your problem but is there a way I can just pay directly with a Visa card?
    May 18, 2020, 10:41:51 PM
  • Wizzo: GPW will be down from approximately 13:30 tomorrow until the migration to the new server is complete. Once the site is "live" on the new server it could take another 24-48 hours to become accessible to all users.
    May 14, 2020, 03:18:44 PM
  • Wizzo: I've made some changes to GPW. Try it now
    April 29, 2020, 02:33:08 PM
  • lkjohnson1950: Hey Wiz, Quarantine Diaries doesn't display right for me. The bottom is cut off of the page and I can't see any post after Alia's.
    April 28, 2020, 08:13:44 PM
  • Dare: Hope your doing ok Braden...just now saw your comment. Don't be a stanger
    April 20, 2020, 04:04:18 AM
  • BraydenSoh: Hi everyone! How's life? Hope everybody still doing well!
    April 13, 2020, 03:48:17 PM
  • Wizzo: Session problem now solved. Thanks
    February 05, 2020, 09:43:41 AM
  • John S: Hey! Anyone else notice the huge number of guests on the site today - Wow!!  :yahoo:
    December 03, 2019, 08:38:00 PM
  • Wizzo: Please note: Japanese qualifying times have been updated.
    October 11, 2019, 02:05:42 PM
  • Scott: I'll be in chat for a change...hope some others will make it too.
    September 07, 2019, 08:58:16 PM
  • cosworth151: This Sunday is Mothers Day here in the States. I'll be helping with the free breakfast we do at our Amvets Post every M's Day, so I'll be popping in and out of the Chat Room
    May 10, 2019, 03:57:04 PM
  • Wizzo: Mothers day here in the UK so I will be absent in the chat room today. Have fun!
    March 31, 2019, 10:47:48 AM
  • Jericoke: For newcomers to GPWizard, make sure you check out the live chat during the race!  It's the best way to turn a dull race into a great time, and the cherry on top of a great race!  (I won't be able to attend Aussie though)
    March 15, 2019, 07:48:58 PM
  • Wizzo: The 2019 Grid Game is now open. Please check out the new rules before entering.
    February 17, 2019, 04:56:33 PM
  • John S: Glad the site is back online, we don't know how much we like it til it's gone. Thanks Wizzo.
    February 02, 2019, 09:19:33 PM
  • Calman: Glad to see you back online Wizzo.  Did the issue point to a corrupted MySQL Data Table?
    February 02, 2019, 08:53:13 PM
  • Wizzo: I apologise for the downtime. Normal service has been resumed.
    February 02, 2019, 07:53:12 PM

* Who's Online

  • Dot Guests: 50
  • Dot Hidden: 0
  • Dot Users: 0

There aren't any users online.

* Top Posters

cosworth151 cosworth151
15698 Posts
Scott Scott
13995 Posts
Dare Dare
12631 Posts
John S John S
10625 Posts
Ian Ian
9705 Posts

Author Topic: Spitballing ideas for assigning 'blame' for a crash  (Read 185 times)

Offline Jericoke

Spitballing ideas for assigning 'blame' for a crash
« on: September 14, 2021, 01:55:08 PM »
As F1 fans, we really do want 'close hard fought racing'.  That's going to lead to crashes that are 'racing incidents' where fair minded drivers both feel entitled to same piece of race track at the same time.

Other crashes are going to be caused by drivers clearly violating the rules, and it's easy to assign blame.

One problem though is some drivers are very crafty and capable of creating a crash that looks like a racing incident.  Or are willing to get into a 'racing incident' that they could have avoided.

In the spirit of making the policing of these incidents a little more clear cut I had a thought:  if a collision has no clear 'wrong' driver, but clearly someone was wrong, why not assign the penalty to the driver ahead in the standings?

This isn't a hill I'm willing to die on, so feel free to tell me why I'm wrong, or what would work better, but in a situation where Hamilton and Max are fighting for the championship, of course Max benefits from a double knock out, so it's not the same risk for him as it is for Hamilton. If Max were automatically blamed for a crash with Hamilton, he'd think twice about taking those chance.  If the tables turn, then Hamilton will have to think twice.

It encourages passing, because drivers will know the cost of 'closing the door'.  It will keep the championship close, by giving the trailing driver a slight advantage.  It wouldn't just apply to first place either, even the midfield and back enders would have a little more room to make passes.

Ideally it would never come up, but if it does, it's an easy tool for the stewards to use for those types of collisions.



Offline monty

Re: Spitballing ideas for assigning 'blame' for a crash
« Reply #1 on: September 14, 2021, 03:07:02 PM »
Jeri makes an interesting point but frankly there just should not be that many incidents that would call for such a system.
I am not kidding anyone that I could ever have been an F1 driver but I raced in lower series and the rules and likely outcomes are just the same.
On most race circuits there is only one racing line (there are exceptions where the corner is really wide and has options from slow in/fast out to fast in/slow out and every combination between but these are very rare). If a driver commits to the racing line there will be no option to adjust that line mid-corner, this is why the phrase 'it was my corner' came about. This was evident in both Verstappen / Hamilton clashes in Italy. On the first lap Hamilton had committed to the corner (it was his corner) but Verstappen chose to drive the corner as if Hamilton wasn't there. Hamilton had the option to go wide and off the circuit or crash - he avoided the crash. After Hamilton left the pits he was again clearly in front when entering the corner and took the racing line (it was his corner) but Verstappen chose to drive at a non-existent gap as if Hamilton wasn't there. On this occasion Hamilton had no choice. I'm sure he never imagined that Verstappen would have been stupid enough to launch an attack there. However, even if was aware Verstappen was trying to 'undertake', he would not have been able to change lines without risking flying off the track anyway (it is simply Physics).
No sensible driver (in any series) tries an overtake on the inside where there are kerbs in place to deliberately discourage such ludicrous tactics. Due to the laws of physics the outcome is inevitable, the car will get pushed outwards to where the other car is already positioned. Verstappen knew exactly what he was doing. He intended to take Hamilton out, but (like Silverstone) he got it badly wrong. On this occasion they were both out - but he knew this would stop Hamilton going on to win and therefore penalised Hamilton more than it did Verstappen.

Offline Scott

Re: Spitballing ideas for assigning 'blame' for a crash
« Reply #2 on: September 14, 2021, 04:55:55 PM »
An interesting idea Jeri.  A 3 place grid penalty for Sochi is a bit of a joke considering how brainless and dangerous the “accident” was.  I would like home to get a ten grid drop and a final warning before a 3 race ban if he does anything like it again.
The Honey Badger doesn't give a...

Offline Alianora La Canta

Re: Spitballing ideas for assigning 'blame' for a crash
« Reply #3 on: September 14, 2021, 06:42:43 PM »
In the spirit of making the policing of these incidents a little more clear cut I had a thought:  if a collision has no clear 'wrong' driver, but clearly someone was wrong, why not assign the penalty to the driver ahead in the standings?

If someone is clearly wrong in a collision, there should be a clear "wrong" driver. If there are multiple clear "wrong" drivers, in my opinion, all "wrong" drivers should receive a penalty according to their contribution. The stewards dislike that approach and always have, but I think it would reduce problems. You can argue the toss all you like, but you have to bear the consequences of your own actions.
« Last Edit: September 14, 2021, 06:44:51 PM by Alianora La Canta »
Percussus resurgio
@lacanta (Twitter)
http://alianoralacanta.tumblr.com (Blog/Tumblr)

Offline Andy B

Re: Spitballing ideas for assigning 'blame' for a crash
« Reply #4 on: September 16, 2021, 01:47:56 AM »
Jeri I could see your idea generating more "accidents" not less and there are permutations that has benefits for the driver behind in the standings.
Once you have retired every day is a Saturday!

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal
Menu Editor Pro 1.0 | Copyright 2013, Matthew Kerle