I had to laugh when I read
the FIA's response to Hill's latest outburst. Between the FIA not noticing the difference between breaching known rules, unknown rules and circumventing tests, they have simply made themselves look even more foolish than they would have done had they shut up and let Hill's comments stand. The criticism that the FIA referred to was actually for forcing the Michelin teams to comply with the rules in a spectacularly short time frame (and it happened in 2003, not 2005 as asserted).
The punchline was right at the end, though:
"The FIA has received no complaint and has no reason to believe that anything which took place between Ferrari and Toyota falls within its competence".
So it's just admitted that the Ferrari/McLaren and the McLaren/Renault cases don't fall within its competence either?