collapse

* Welcome

Welcome to GPWizard F1 Forum!

GPWizard is the friendliest F1 forum you'll find anywhere. You have a host of new like-minded friends waiting to welcome you.

So what are you waiting for? Becoming a member is easy and free! Take a couple seconds out of your day and register now. We guarantee, you wont be sorry you did.

Click Here to become a full Member for Free

* User Info

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Newsletter

GPWizard F1 Forum Newsletter Email address:
Weekly
Fortnightly
Monthly

* Grid Game Deadlines

Qualifying

Race

* Shoutbox

Refresh History
  • Wizzo: :good:
    March 05, 2024, 11:44:46 PM
  • Dare: my chat button is onthe bottom rightWiz
    March 03, 2024, 11:58:24 PM
  • Wizzo: Yes you should see the chat room button at the bottom left of your screen
    March 02, 2024, 11:39:55 PM
  • Open Wheel: Is there a Chat room button or something to access “Race day conversation”
    March 02, 2024, 02:46:02 PM
  • Wizzo: The 2024 Grid Game is here!  :yahoo:
    January 30, 2024, 01:42:23 PM
  • Wizzo: Hey everybody - the shout box is back!  :D
    August 21, 2023, 12:18:19 PM

* Who's Online

  • Dot Guests: 603
  • Dot Hidden: 0
  • Dot Users: 0

There aren't any users online.

* Top Posters

cosworth151 cosworth151
16158 Posts
Scott Scott
14057 Posts
Dare Dare
12990 Posts
John S John S
11275 Posts
Ian Ian
9729 Posts

Author Topic: Teams give some idea of 'cost regulation document'  (Read 2467 times)

Offline John S

  • F1 Legend
  • ****
  • Date Registered: Jan 2007
  • Location: Lincolnshire, UK
  • Posts: 11275
  • 11550 credits
  • View Inventory
  • Send Money To John S
  • Max for 3rd title! - to see more Toto apoplexy.
Teams give some idea of 'cost regulation document'
« on: July 25, 2009, 10:22:10 AM »

At last a bit of meat on the bone. Rumour amongst other sources suggests that it's Williams and Manor that are holding up the signing off by all the teams, but no word on what they are objecting to.

Formula One Teams Association figures on Friday began to lift the lid on the mysterious 'Cost Regulation Document' that will replace Max Mosley's preferred budget cap beginning next year.

The FIA confirmed on Friday that once the legally-binding contract is signed off by the F1 teams, the Concorde Agreement can be pushed through and the recent tumultuous period of political instability sidelined at least until 2012.

Until now however the actual content of the document has been closely guarded by the FOTA alliance, and even on Friday only a few details were divulged.

Toro Rosso's Franz Tost told reporters at the Hungaroring that, quite apart from this year's frenetic rate of development, only three changes to fundamental aerodynamic parts next year will be allowed.

"For example, front wings, rear wings. They are homologated," he said.

"You can bring out three new modifications, the floor as well, the monocoque, also only one crash structure. That means that FOTA has worked out quite a good programme where we are convinced that we can reduce costs," Tost added.

Christian Horner and Stefano Domenicali, meanwhile, of the Red Bull and Ferrari teams respectively, revealed that the number of personnel per team attending races is to be capped. 
 
Domenicali said similar staff number restrictions will not apply to factories.

"All that I can say is that we are working on a situation in order to reduce the number of people at races.

"All the other things are related to something that we will exploit internally because everyone has their own organisation, so we cannot say that everyone is doing the same thing as the others," he explained.

Horner said he believes it is FOTA's efforts to reduce costs, for example also in the areas of testing bans and summer factory closures, that paved the way for three new teams to enter the sport next year.

"I think Formula One has reacted responsibly," he said. "It's positive to see new teams entered for next year which would have been impossible, I think, without the resource restrictions that will be introduced."

© CAPSIS International



Racing is Life - everything else is just....waiting. (Steve McQueen)

Offline Jericoke

Re: Teams give some idea of 'cost regulation document'
« Reply #1 on: July 25, 2009, 11:52:57 AM »
Three updates a season?  Sounds like a nightmare to police.  I can just see a team saying 'That's not a new piece, our contractor just didn't get it right.  With the factory closed, we didn't have time to make the right one.  A mere coincidence that it makes the car faster'.

Offline Alianora La Canta

Re: Teams give some idea of 'cost regulation document'
« Reply #2 on: August 01, 2009, 11:01:43 PM »
This seems like a good way of deciding the championship at the first race. Even this year, with unlimited updates, there has been little change in team hierarchy. With only three upgrades a year (and one chassis upgrade), scope for improvement will be very, very limited. Do we want to see more teams giving up mid-season and spending lots of money to coast along?

What we're going to end up with is F1 taking out all the value along with some of the costs, and still be no nearer a competitive championship (and, if anything, further away).
Percussus resurgio
@lacanta (Twitter)
http://alianoralacanta.tumblr.com (Blog/Tumblr)

akash01

  • Guest
Re: Teams give some idea of 'cost regulation document'
« Reply #3 on: October 09, 2009, 01:04:33 PM »
there has been little change in team hierarchy.

great history..........funny.

Offline cosworth151

Re: Teams give some idea of 'cost regulation document'
« Reply #4 on: October 09, 2009, 02:37:45 PM »
There were times in the past when teams missed the mark so badly that they talked about bringing back the previous season's car. I wonder if that would be allowed under these rules.
“You can search the world over for the finer things, but you won't find a match for the American road and the creatures that live on it.”
― Bob Dylan

Offline Jericoke

Re: Teams give some idea of 'cost regulation document'
« Reply #5 on: October 09, 2009, 05:13:37 PM »
There were times in the past when teams missed the mark so badly that they talked about bringing back the previous season's car. I wonder if that would be allowed under these rules.

I don't see why not, as long as it fits in the limited number of changes.

My question is... can a team change back and forth?  One car for high speed tracks, one for low speed, and 2 revisions as needed?

Offline Alianora La Canta

Re: Teams give some idea of 'cost regulation document'
« Reply #6 on: October 09, 2009, 10:48:12 PM »
Given that the regulations change every single year these days, a team hasn't been able to go back to the previous model since 2005.
Percussus resurgio
@lacanta (Twitter)
http://alianoralacanta.tumblr.com (Blog/Tumblr)

Offline Jericoke

Re: Teams give some idea of 'cost regulation document'
« Reply #7 on: October 10, 2009, 03:27:37 PM »
Given that the regulations change every single year these days, a team hasn't been able to go back to the previous model since 2005.

Which is a great way to save money...  :crazy:

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal
Menu Editor Pro 1.0 | Copyright 2013, Matthew Kerle