collapse

* User Info

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Newsletter

GPWizard F1 Forum Newsletter Email address:
Weekly
Fortnightly
Monthly

* Grid Game Deadlines

Qualifying

Race

* Shoutbox

Refresh History
  • Wizzo: :good:
    March 05, 2024, 11:44:46 PM
  • Dare: my chat button is onthe bottom rightWiz
    March 03, 2024, 11:58:24 PM
  • Wizzo: Yes you should see the chat room button at the bottom left of your screen
    March 02, 2024, 11:39:55 PM
  • Open Wheel: Is there a Chat room button or something to access “Race day conversation”
    March 02, 2024, 02:46:02 PM
  • Wizzo: The 2024 Grid Game is here!  :yahoo:
    January 30, 2024, 01:42:23 PM
  • Wizzo: Hey everybody - the shout box is back!  :D
    August 21, 2023, 12:18:19 PM

* Who's Online

  • Dot Guests: 266
  • Dot Hidden: 0
  • Dot Users: 1
  • Dot Users Online:

* Top Posters

cosworth151 cosworth151
16178 Posts
Scott Scott
14057 Posts
Dare Dare
13016 Posts
John S John S
11293 Posts
Ian Ian
9729 Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
I think the biggest cause of today's F1 "lorries" (with a nod to Ettore Bugatti  ;)  ) is the hybrid system followed closely by fuel enough for the entire race.
2
Inverted engines are not a new idea. Many popular aircraft engines of the 1930's and 40's were inverted. Many WWII German warplanes were powered by Mercedes Benz 600 series and Junkers Jumo inverted vee engines. DeHavilland built an inverted inline Gypsy engine that powered many of their famous Moth biplanes. Here in the States, Fairchild's Ranger Engine Div. built inverted engines ranging from an inline 4 to a V-12.

Below is a pix of an MB 601 mounted in a Messerschmidt ME-109 fighter.
3
I find it interesting that the rules are setup in such a way that it's a challenge to achieve the minimum weight.

In the past cars carried ballast to meet weight requirements, so it's interesting that every part of the car now is crucial, and getting the weight down means making a sacrifice somewhere else... or finding a brilliant solution.

(And I do appreciate that a lot of the 'excess' weight and size of a modern F1 car is dedicated to safety features)
4
Vowles says they trimmed 14kg - yes 14kg coming into this season
..............and they're still overweight.  :o  :swoon:

Wonder how many other bottom feeding teams are also overweight?   :DntKnw:

https://racingnews365.com/williams-to-correct-five-year-suffering-over-next-six-grands-prix
5
F1 Drivers / Re: 2025 driver line up.
« Last post by Andy B on May 16, 2024, 09:56:38 PM »
The only reason I would not choose Bottas is that mullet if he gets a haircut he's in!  :DD
6
I currently run a 12 year old diesel, which is slowly being banned from city centres here in Europe.  So my next one will be petrol.

As much as I would like to go electric, I don't see the use case yet for me. The range is simply not there and as you drive east in Europe (which I do from time to time) the charging infrastructure is not there either. They are great for cities and short journeys, but that would mean buying one car for the family holidays and another for local jouney's, which surely cannot be the point. In addition I am happy getting around on public transport and my bike where I live.

The problem with hydrogen as I understand it is that from an energy perspective it is not terribly efficient. First you use electricity and make the hydrogen at a power station somewhere. Then you use the hydrogen to produce the electricity that powers the car. From an efficiency point of view, you might as well just go electric.



7
F1 Drivers / Re: 2025 driver line up.
« Last post by Jericoke on May 16, 2024, 04:59:45 PM »
I guess it's assumed Danny R is out next year no matter
what he does the rest the year. If Max moves which I find
unlikely that would throw a wrench in the works. Carlos 
deserves a better seat than what it looks like he'll get

Certainly the driver market has a lot of room still.

I do find it interesting that people seem to pick Bottas over Ricciardo.  Based on current performance, it's hard to say who's the better driver, and who would bring more to a team.  They're both race winners.  They both have strong fan bases that can bring in sponsors/media attention.

If I was running an F1 team that wasn't expecting to win, I might be more inclined to pick Daniel.  He's got experience with more teams, and could be a constructive figure in what to do (and what not to do).  Bottas's time at Williams and Sauber probably doesn't help a team with aspirations, and his time as Hamilton's rear gunner probably isn't as valuable either (although it can be noted Mercedes was much better with Bottas than without...)

If I was running a team expecting to win though, I'd choose Bottas.  He seems to have a better mindset for that, to handle the challenges that come with being at the pointy end of the grid.  Ricciardo out performed a WDC teammate in Vettel, but then couldn't handle having Verstappen alongside him.
8
There are plenty of great ways to power an automobile.  Gasoline/petrol won out, but there were competing technologies way back when:  electric, diesel, ethanol, steam.

I'm glad people continue to innovate on how to power cars more efficiently and sustainably.   Electric has a huge edge because the infrastructure exists.  Just plug a charging station into the existing electrical grid.  Even if hydrogen (or something else!) is 'better', they're still going to have to solve how to get hydrogen into everyone's car.

I still drive a gasoline powered car, and my next vehicle is likely to be as well.  Even though the charging infrastructure is growing, I don't feel like I can trust it compared with gas.  (Doesn't help that the continent's largest supplier of charging stations just fired the entire charging team https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/inside-story-elon-musks-mass-firings-tesla-supercharger-staff-2024-05-15/)
9
F1 Drivers / Re: 2025 driver line up.
« Last post by cosworth151 on May 16, 2024, 03:34:53 PM »
Quote
Haas pairing will be Zhou Guanyu & Ollie Bearman.
Chinese sponsors and strategic things for Gene Haas other business interests will probably swing this.

I can see one big problem with this. A major talking point for the upcoming elections here in the States is who can be the toughest on China. Every candidate seems to want to out-sanction their opposition. Any Chinese sponsorship deals could be outlawed as quickly as the Uralkali sponsorship deal. For Gene, it could well be a case of "once bitten, twice shy."

Ferrari will pretty much require Bearman. I look for him to be paired with Ocon or Bottas.

My dark horse pick would be Sargeant, strictly to have an American driver with an American team. Since Andretti might end Hass's time as the American team, an American driver might be a good PR move.
10
Seems Maranello is not convinced EVs are the future for supercars.

Not sure I follow all the specific aspects talked about in video, maybe it makes sense to others of you out there.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10

SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal
Menu Editor Pro 1.0 | Copyright 2013, Matthew Kerle